![bk butler tube driver vs ocd bk butler tube driver vs ocd](https://guitars.azureedge.net/aza/user/gear/bk-butler-tube-driver.jpg)
Additionally, the Barber Pedals have a few other aces up their sleeve to include a wide variety of Gain/Voice options that, something like the Charlie Brown does not offer. It is only the lack of a dedicated BASS dial/control that introduces any sort of perceived limitation in comparison to the granular control provided by the other two pedals and YET, the reality, as I have come to find, is that the EQ offerings in the switch pretty much nail the most desired settings that I would have dialed in on the CB or Benson anyway. Example: With the Direct Drive set on the low gain setting and, with the EQ switch set in the middle (mid focused), keeping the control around 3pm give-or-take, the Barber can match many of the Marshall-esque voices of the other two pedals. In this respect, these pedals cover a lot of ground with concerns to their EQ settings. The Gain Changer is very similar but with a more traditional Tone knob.
![bk butler tube driver vs ocd bk butler tube driver vs ocd](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-N4zaRajWLz0/T0zoK3shgwI/AAAAAAAAA_s/NgWA41i501k/s1600/BK+Tubedriver+016.jpg)
![bk butler tube driver vs ocd bk butler tube driver vs ocd](https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/2ocAAOSw74ReHrgx/s-l1600.jpg)
Buffalo FX TD-X (Tubeless clone of BK Butler Tube Driver).Benson Preamp (Preamp section from the Benson Monarch, influenced by the Marshall JTM 45).Barber Compact Direct Drive v.4 (British Voice Inspired),.Pedals featured in this post (as pictured above): As I tend to take residency in my low-gain overdrive section more often than not, my curiosity with such pedals led me on a meandering exploration of the many great options that today’s marketplace has to offer and, while the focus here may be skewed towards low gain, the ability to reach into high gain territory is always a welcomed feature.